Welcome to AIHFA Howard.
Howard has many interesting views on audio and music related topics, some of which he shares regularly on his Blog and now also on AIHFA.
Not only will AIHFA be re-publishing classic and current articles from Howard’s blog but also a future series of comparison reviews (the main thrust of this As I See It), a few of which will be written exclusively for AIHFA.
The focus of these reviews will be to test the proposition that “new is not always better than old ” and thus classic audio components and current products, occupying similar positions in today’s market place will be compared. These reviews promises to be a very exciting future read.
Over to you Howard…..
IS THERE A MAJOR DISCONNECT BETWEEN THE AUDIOPHILE MAGAZINES AND THEIR READERS ? By Howard Popeck
There is in my view a major disconnect between the audiophile magazines and their readers.
It’s an understandable one but in my view an important one – and it’s the focus of this As I See It article.
Although I’m a UK-based high-end retailer (also once a published in print reviewer too ED), I am curiously despite 34 years on and off, still interested in music first and foremost and then the equipment that reproduces it somewhere after that. With my end-user hat on I have to say that in a lot of my vintage gear is certainly, performance-wise, up to the standard of a lot of modern equipment. It’s not all plain sailing of course and there is the tricky issue of value versus price. Let me explain.
Take the Audio Research SP-8 for example.
Venerable, rightly revered and a bargain on the used market. Yes of course my ARC SP-10 and ARC SP-11 preamps were more musically credible and probably still are for their fortunate new owners. But in too many instances this clear and immediate superiority is the exception rather than the rule.
Is the latest MF power amp of a similar specification noticeably AND significantly superior to this slightly scuffed but fully functioning ‘antique’?
Somehow, I doubt it. Different, certainly. But more musically credible? Hmm, somehow I doubt that too. But I could be wrong. Very wrong in fact. So other than through a reckless and substantial investment whereby I buy a comparative brand new MF unit (I’m not an MF retailer but I very much admire the quality and value of their equipment) I would have to confront the probability of selling one of the two units at some financial loss. Without this investment, which surely must be a similarly unfortunate conundrum for most audiophiles with less than infinite financial resources, how am I (or they) to know?
Now where do the magazines come into all this you might ask?
Well let’s assume (naïve though it might be) that their primary reason for existence is to serve to needs of the reader. If so, then surely a side-by-side comparison of the two Musical Fidelity power amps (used purely for illustrative purposes in this post) is as valid as the mooted ARC SP8 versus SP10 comparison for example? Clearly no advertiser of new equipment in an audiophile magazine would countenance this if they knew that the much touted new model really – at best – only soundeddifferent to its vintage same-brand rival rather than better. Well, okay – that goes with territory.
The mags need to make a profit and to pay the staff at least a reasonable wage. But the point remains that given (a) the over-supply of new high-end gear in a diminishing market and (b) the buyers’ market for high-value vintage gear that may indeed – or possibly not – sonically rival the performance of new gear and (c) the justified end-user cynicism regarding the hype and hyperbole of marketing phrases re new gear, then end-users are at a significant disadvantage when seeking value rather than lowest pricing. The paradox is that the very people most suited to addressing this are constrained by economic reality. So, what’s to be done?
Well, I’m thinking of doing a few comparative subjective reviews myself here.
Possibly for my own amusement and possibly to the altruistic benefit of others. My question though is – is there a demand?
Meanwhile, my Musical Fidelity P270 sounds terrific into myVandersteen 2c Signatures. As a start, I’m going to compare the P270 to something much newer of a similar spec and, as best I can judge, of a comparative price – once 23 years of inflation are factored in. I’m using aCarver 400t preamp, various SAE preamps, a Meridian 101b, a recentArcam pre and North Star 2-box CD player. This leads me conveniently to the conclusion that modern DACs truly are an improvement (generally speaking) over vintage ones. I say this having owned the $20k USDSTAX X1-t. This isn’t the case with speakers though.
Re vintage speakers that to me easily equal or indeed surpass the performance of rivals from modern competitors I’d put the Magneplanar20.R right up there with the finest. Similarly with the Infinity IRS and theSpendor BC3s. These BC3s although not quite as immediately compelling (in the mid and treble at least) as the Harbeth 40.1s can be had for a tiny fraction of the latter’s price. Dahlquist DQ10s being another case in point. And so it goes. Servicing issues must of course always be taken into account.
Are the magnificent (also in my view too ED) vintage Rowland power amps truly altogether lesser beasts than their new units? Incidentally am I the only one over here that feels (no, not feels … actually knows) that Rowland really is one of this industry’s forgotten brands? And no, I’m not a retailer for them either!
I now use a big old Denon Direct drive in a custom plinth comprising multiple layers of notinventedherium interspersed with layers of female yak-dung as a vibration absorber. The improvement using the female free-range version (1958 vintage) compared to the battery-farmed YD of recent years is nothing short of astonishing.
Finally, as I write this I’m listening to true vintage. Pink Floyd “Echoes” off the very rare “Rhapsody In Pink” live set through a single mono speaker – which is all I can fit into my office (not orifice, but office) right now If like me you saw the Floyd performing this live, then the absence of Pace, Rhythm & Timing through this both lossy and lousy system is an utter irrelevance. The musical trigger to the memory is sufficient, for me at least.
© Text Copyright Howard Popeck 2010
NB The views of those who contribute to As I See It should not be taken as necessarily reflecting the views of the AIHFA management or its other contributors. They are solely the views of their authors and are presented as thought provoking articles only.
NB No part or portion of this article may be reproduced or quoted without written permission.